미국의 그림자권력은 왜 핵전쟁을 도모하나요?

"종말의 날 포럼" : 미국의 1조달러 핵무기 계획 -

 러시아, 이란, 북한을 제거하라

“The Doomsday Forum”: America’s “$1 Trillion Nuclear Weapons Plan” ? Take out Russia, Iran and North Korea By Prof Michel Chossudovsky May 4, 2017 - 12:31:31 AM http://truepublica.org.uk/global/doomsday-forum-americas-1-trillion-nuclear-weapons-plan-take-russia-iran-north-korea/

이 기사는 2016 년 7 월 8 일에 처음 게시되었습니다. 마이클 초수도프스키 Michel Chossudovsky 교수 - 세계화 연구 센터 소장 겸 이사 :

This article was first published on July 8, 2016 By Prof. Michel Chossudovsky - president and director of the Centre for Research on Globalization:

미국의 선제 핵공격 교리는 도널드 트럼프가 백악관에 입성하기 전에 확고하게 수립되었다. 북한에 대한 핵무기 사용은 반세기가 넘는 기간 동안 미국방부의 계획에 있었다. 오바마 행정부 하에서 2016 년 6 월, 무기 산업의 CEO와 함께 최고군사 도당이 러시아, 중국, 이란 및 북한에 대한 핵무기 배치를 논의했습니다.

이 결정은 고위급 의사 결정권자를 민감하게 하기위한 것이었습니다. 초점은 주요 요원들에게(군대, 과학 실험실, 원자력 산업 등에서)  핵전쟁과 선제공격에 찬성하도록  공감대를 형성하는데 있었다.

 America's pre-emptive nuclear doctrine was firmly entrenched prior to Donald Trump's accession to the White House. The use of nukes against North Korea has been on the drawing-board of the Pentagon for more than half a century. In June 2016 under the Obama administration, top military brass together with the CEOs of the weapons industry debated the deployment of nuclear weapons against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea.

The event was intended to sensitise senior decision makers. The focus was on  building a consensus (within the Armed Forces, the science labs, the nuclear industry, etc) in favor of pre-emptive nuclear war

그것은 군대와 무기산업의 고위급 의사 결정권자 (최고 관리)를 대상으로 한 "내부 선전"이며 세뇌작업의 한 형태였습니다. 그것은 서구 세계를 위협하고있는 러시아를 포함한 네개국의 "불량" 국가에 대한 핵 (공중, 육지 및 해양)의 "선제" 공격을 통해 "평화 구축"과 "세계 안보"에 중점을 둔다는 것이다.

종말의 날 포럼 Doomsday Forum의 기조 연설자 중 한 명인 USAF 핵통합 담당 참모장인 로빈랜드 Robin Rand는 현재 마티스 Mattis 국방 장관의 관할 하에서 동아시아에 대한 공습 능력 배치를 조정하고있다. Robin Rand 장군은 공군의 핵무기와 폭격기 책임자입니다. 그의 책임은 "최첨단 무기를 [동아시아] 지역에 배치하려는 계획을 추진하는 것" 인데, 최근 보고서는 군대 내에서 이에대한 합의가 이뤄지고 있음을 확인했다.

It was a form of "internal propaganda" intended for senior decision makers (Top Officials) within the military as well as the weapons industry. The emphasis was on "building peace" and "global security" through the "pre-emptive" deployment of nukes (Air, Land and Sea) against four designated "rogue" countries, which allegedly are threatening the Western World.

One of keynote speakers at the Doomsday Forum, USAF Chief of Staff for Nuclear Integration, Gen. Robin Rand, is presently involved under the helm of Secretary of Defense General Mattis in coordinating the deployment of strike capabilities to East Asia. Gen. Robin Rand heads the Air Force's nuclear forces and bombers. His responsibility consists in "moving ahead with plans to deploy its most advanced weapons to the [East Asian] region..." Recent reports confirm an unfolding consensus within the military establishment:

"군사 지도자들은 정기적으로 그리고 트럼프 행정부 변경 이후에 중국, 러시아, 북한, 이란, ISIS 등을 미래의 주요 관심 분야로 지목했다. 안보 관점에서 볼 때 북한과의 긴장은 계속 커지고있다. 북한의 핵 미사일 계획에 대응하기 위해 미국은 사드 THAAD 미사일요격 미사일의 배치를 한국에 재촉했다. 이는 서울과 일본을 어느 정도 확신시킨 것이지만, 베이징을 격분시켰다 "고 보고했다. 방위 원Defense on e, 2017 년 3 월 17 일

"Military leaders regularly, and since the change of administration, have listed China, Russia, North Korea, Iran, and ISIS as the major areas of concern for the future. From a security standpoint, tensions with North Korea continue to escalate, with reverberations throughout the region. In response to Pyongyang's nuclear missile program, ... the U.S. sped up the deployment of THAAD anti-missile interceptors to South Korea. This may reassure Seoul, and to a lesser extent Tokyo, but it has incensed Beijing." Defense on e, March 17, 2017

숨겨진 진실은 한국에 배치된 사드 THAAD 미사일은 조선민주주의 인민공화국을 향한 것이 아니며, 그것은 중국과 러시아에 대항해 사용될 예정이란 것이다.

The unspoken truth is that the THAAD missiles to be stationed in South Korea are not intended for the DPRK, they are slated to be used against China and Russia.

마이클 초수도프스키  Michel Chossudovsky, April 28, 2017

2016 년 6 월 21 일 뉴멕시코 주 앨버커키에있는 크라운 플라자 호텔 (Crowne Plaza Hotel)에서 핵무기 실험실의 250 명의 군인, 군사계획자, 기업 군- 산업 "방위"계약자, 최고 관리 및 과학자, 토론자들이 모여 토론한다. 그 목적은 국방부의 1 조 달러 핵무기 프로그램에 대한 토론과 홍보에 있다. 발제는 러시아가 "서방 세계를 위협하고 있다"는 주제로 시작한다. 목표는 핵무기의 선제 적 사용 (즉, 미국의 자기 방어수단으로서의 핵전쟁)을 개발하는 것입니다.

"전략 억지력 연합 The Strategic Deterrent Coalition"(비영리 기관)이 주최한 행사는 Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Orbital ATK, BAE Systems 방위산업체가 기부자들에게 자금을 지원했습니다.

On June 21, 2016,  250 top military brass, military planners, corporate military-industrial  "defence" contractors, top officials and scientists from the nuclear weapons laboratories as well as prominent  academics gathered at the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico to discuss, debate and promote the Pentagon's on e Trillion Dollar Nuclear Weapons program.

Russia is allegedly "threatening the Western World". The objective is to develop the pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons (i.e. nuclear war as a means of self-defence).

The event organised by "The Strategic Deterrent Coalition" (a non profit organisation) was  funded by Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Orbital ATK, BAE Systems  among other generous donors.

Among the main speakers (see program here) were Adm. Cecil Haney, Commander of the US Strategic Command (STRATCOM), Lt. Gen. Jack Weinstein, Dep. USAF Chief of Staff for Nuclear Integration, Gen. Robin Rand, Commander, Air Force Global Strike Command, Gen. (ret.) Frank Klotz, Administrator, National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), as well senior officials from America's top weapons labs including Sandia, Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore. Representatives from the UK, Canada, Denmark and the Republic of Korea (ROK) were also in attendance.

STRATCOM 사령관인 세실 D.하니 (Cecil D. Haney)에 따르면 "미국은 핵 억지력의 실행 가능성을 보장하기 위한 시간을 빠르게 허비하고 있으며, 핵무기 비축뿐만 아니라 미사일, 잠수함 우리가 결코 만들 필요가없는 공습을 감행할 능력이 있는 폭격기 "라고 주장했다.(Albuquerque Journal, June 22, 2016)

According to STRATCOM Commander Adm. Cecil D. Haney, (image right) "America is quickly running out of time to ensure the viability of its nuclear deterrence and must invest the funds to upgrade not on ly its nuclear weapons stockpile, but the missiles, submarines and bombers capable of delivering a strike we hope we never have to make". (Albuquerque Journal, June 22, 2016)

하니 제독 Adm Haney는 2002 년에 공식적으로 폐지된 냉전 개념인 " 억제력 deterrence"를 언급한다 (2001 Nuclear Posture Review 하에서). 미국의 핵 교리에 따라 고려되는 것은 핵무기와 비핵 국가 모두에 대한 핵무기의 선제 공격이다.

미국의 적들이 분명히 밝혀졌습니다. 선진 핵무기의 "선제적"사용 (자기 방어를 위한)이 고려되는 공격 국가는 명시적으로 언급되었다. Haney는 러시아, 중국, 북한, 이란, 극단주의 단체인 이시스 이슬람 국가와 알 (Ali) 등의 행동으로 인해 역사상 가장 불안정한 시점에 있을 수 있다고 말한 세계의 "전략적 환경"에 대한 개요를 발표했다. - Qaida.

Adm Haney refers to "deterrence", a Cold War concept which was officially scrapped in 2002 (under the 2001 Nuclear Posture Review). What is contemplated under America's nuclear doctrine is the first strike pre-emptive use of nuclear weapons against both nuclear as well as non-nuclear states.

The enemies of America were clearly identified. The aggressor nations against which the "preemptive" use (for self-defense) of  advanced nuclear weapons is contemplated were  explicitly mentioned:

Haney presented an overview of the world's "strategic environment" which he said may be at its most precarious point in history - in large part because of the actions of Russia, China, North Korea, Iran and extremist groups such as the Islamic State and al-Qaida.

Russia poses a threat just by virtue of the size of its nuclear arsenal, which it continues to modernize, but it's also improving its conventional military forces, maintaining a significant quantity of non-strategic nuclear weapons and aggressively pursuing new war-fighting technologies, he said. (Albuquerque Journal, June 22, 2016)

The event sponsored by the Strategic Deterrent Coalition (SDC) was geared towards the "education of decision-makers on the importance of a "valid nuclear triad" - strategic bombers, land-launched missiles and submarine-launched missiles - according to its board president, Sherman McCorkle." The notion of Triad "relates to the fact that U.S. strategic nuclear weapons are based in the water, on land and in the air"

Propaganda: Sensitizing "Top Officials"

The SDC's "educational endeavour" largely consists in building a consensus in favour of pre-emptive nuclear war (within the Armed Forces, the science labs, the nuclear industry, etc). It's is a form of "internal propaganda" intended for senior decision makers (Top Officials) within the military as well as the weapons industry. The emphasis is "building peace" and "global security" through the "pre-emptive" deployment of nukes (Air, Land and Sea) against four designated "rogue" countries, which allegedly are threatening the Western World.

The debate was coupled with veiled threats pointing to the possible use of nuclear warheads on a first strike basis against Russia, North Korea and Iran:

Coupled with Russian President Vladimir Putin's rhetoric and "destabilising actions in Syria and Ukraine," Haney cautioned that "Russia must understand that it would be a serious miscalculation to consider nuclear escalation as a viable option."

North Korea continues to undermine regional stability by conducting nuclear tests and advancing its ballistic missile technology, Haney said.

Iran's continued involvement in Middle East conflicts and development of ballistic missile programs and cyberspace capabilities require vigilance, particularly if there are any shifts in Iran's nuclear ambitions, he said. (Albuquerque Journal, June 22, 2016)

Theatre of the absurd: the US is intent upon using nuclear weapons as a means of self defence against Al Qaeda and ISIS under the Administration's counter-terrorism initiative:

And the United States is part of an international campaign against violent extremist organisations groups "seeking to destroy our democratic way of life."

To effectively keep adversaries and potential adversaries in check, America must maintain "a safe, secure, effective and ready nuclear deterrent."

Lest we forget, Al Qaeda was created by the CIA and the ISIS is supported and funded by two of America's staunchest allies: Turkey and Saudi Arabia.

The on e Trillion Dollar Question: "Blow up the Planet", "Bankrupt  the Country"

"Blowing up the Planet" through the use of "peace-making nuclear bombs" is a money making undertaking, a corporate bonanza  for what Eisenhower called "the military industrial complex":  "All three legs of the "nuclear triad" must receive considerable investments to ensure their long-term viability" (Adm. Haney, op cit).

The expenditure is for a 30-year program to "modernise" the US nuclear arsenal and production facilities. ... This plan, which has received almost no attention by the mass media, includes redesigned nuclear warheads, as well as new nuclear bombers, submarines, land-based missiles, weapons labs and production plants. The estimated cost? $1,000,000,000,000.00 - or, for those readers unfamiliar with such lofty figures, $1 trillion.

Critics charge that the expenditure of this staggering sum will either bankrupt the country or, at the least, require massive cutbacks in funding for other federal government programs. (Prof. Lawrence S. Wittner,  The History News Network)

Hillary Clinton -whose election campaign is also supported by Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman et al favours the first strike use of nuclear weapons:

... "the nuclear option should not at all be taken off the table. That has been my position consistently." (ABC News, December 15, 2015)

"I want the Iranians to know that if I'm president, we will attack Iran. In the next 10 years, during which they might foolishly consider launching an attack on Israel, we would be able to totally obliterate them." (ABC "Good Morning America.", quoted by Reuters, April 22, 2008 during 2008 presidential election campaign)

The World is at a dangerous crossroads. A new arms race has been launched. It's planning horizon is thirty years. The money allocated by the US federal government to the development of America's pre-emptive nuclear war arsenal is of the order of on e trillion dollars, that is the preliminary estimate, an astronomical amount (which could be increased):

"Today, our stockpile is the oldest it's ever been, with the average age of a (nuclear) warhead at 27 years and growing," he said.

The nation's national security labs - like Sandia, Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore - are key to ensuring the viability of the nuclear arsenal.

Despite the challenges, Haney said, "U.S. Strategic Command is a ready force capable of delivering comprehensive war-fighting solutions."

In  response to this venue, the Los Alamos Study Group (LASG) organised a counter-event symposium on June 20-21. The LASG referred to the  Strategic Deterrent Coalition's Symposium as the "Doomsday Forum".

According to Los Alamos Study Group (LASG) director Greg Mello: "This Symposium comes at a time when ambitious US nuclear weapons plans, expected to cost $1 trillion over the next 30 years, are coming under withering criticism from recent US senior military and civilian defense officials, independent analysts, members of Congress, and diplomats".

The nuclear weapons plan constitutes a multibillion dollar bonanza, ironically, for the military industrial contractors which generously financed the Symposium:  "...Air Force nuclear weapons replacements and upgrades are expected to cost hundreds of billions of dollars. Much of that money would go to the sponsors of this symposium."

This important event -which consists in building a consensus in favor of a possible first strike pre-emptive US nuclear attack against Russia, China, Iran and North Korea- has barely been covered by the mainstream media.

Oops....The organisers must have got their countries mixed up: North Korea was on the list of invitees. Canada was not mentioned.

http://truepublica.org.uk/global/doomsday-forum-americas-1-trillion-nuclear-weapons-plan-take-russia-iran-north-korea/

 

가져온 곳 : 

블로그 >피터김의 체험 나누기